Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 3:58:40 GMT
Many people wonder about the actual usefulness of quality content. Some are disappointed by the fact that, at first glance, the public tends to prefer silly and low-level things. Ungrammatical texts and silly videos are often more successful than a post on “ The best tactics for lead generation ”. The problem encountered with content is now well known. If you have an editorial/multimedia project that aims to attract a large number of visits, you must inevitably be able to adapt to a varied audience.
I often read about copywriters who complain about how stupid and ignorant India Mobile Number Data the public is, how culture and beautiful content are not appreciated, because the world is ugly and feeds on garbage. I don't think this is exactly the problem. If we took the mass in its totality, we would be tempted to think that it is a structurally foolish entity dedicated to futility. Personally, I believe that each of us is a constituent element of the mass and I also believe that anyone who is taken outside the specific area of expertise appears inexperienced if not completely unprepared.
When we publish a post on Facebook that talks about "single-stage planetary gearboxes" we are perfectly aware that this content will not get the same public response as a photo of a kitten or the latest episode of MasterChef. Some topics are of general interest or arouse emotions that are easily interpreted by anyone. If, like I did, you have chosen to publish for a narrow range of audiences dealing with a niche topic, you shouldn't be surprised by the fact that other bloggers, with more popular content, get ten times the number of visits than you. It is not a question of widespread ignorance, but of usability and greater or lesser interest in a certain topic.
I often read about copywriters who complain about how stupid and ignorant India Mobile Number Data the public is, how culture and beautiful content are not appreciated, because the world is ugly and feeds on garbage. I don't think this is exactly the problem. If we took the mass in its totality, we would be tempted to think that it is a structurally foolish entity dedicated to futility. Personally, I believe that each of us is a constituent element of the mass and I also believe that anyone who is taken outside the specific area of expertise appears inexperienced if not completely unprepared.
When we publish a post on Facebook that talks about "single-stage planetary gearboxes" we are perfectly aware that this content will not get the same public response as a photo of a kitten or the latest episode of MasterChef. Some topics are of general interest or arouse emotions that are easily interpreted by anyone. If, like I did, you have chosen to publish for a narrow range of audiences dealing with a niche topic, you shouldn't be surprised by the fact that other bloggers, with more popular content, get ten times the number of visits than you. It is not a question of widespread ignorance, but of usability and greater or lesser interest in a certain topic.